DIFFERENCE OF LEARNING PROGRESS IN STUDENTS BY USING CHALK-TALK STRATEGY AND TRAINING AIDS

Authors

  • Asadullah Ph.D Scholar, Institute of Research and Education, Muslim Youth University Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Salma Shahzadi Ph.D Scholar, Institute of Research and Education, Muslim Youth University Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Asia Rubab Ph.D Scholar, Institute of Research and Education, Muslim Youth University Islamabad, Pakistan Author

Abstract

In teaching, Chalk-Talk strategy and use of trg aids  play vital role for learning of students. To check the difference in both, study was conducted “Difference of learning progress in students by using chalk-talk strategy and training aids”, comprising objectives; to find learning progress in students by using chalk-talk strategy; to find learning progress in students by using training aids; and to find out the difference in both strategies. Researcher used quantitative research approach, experimental research design and convenience sampling method was used. Two sections of a class, A (experimental group) & B (control group) comprising 30 students each were selected for the experiment.  Class A was taught through the training aids and Class B was taught through chalk-talk method for 15 days. Pre-test of subject being taught through the period of experiment and post test was conducted after completion the experiment for collection of data. Results of the study show that, progress of learning of students was low in chalk-talk strategy in comparison to training aids. Study recommends that modern training aids may be utilized in educational institutions as the utilization of training aids brought a good impact on the learning progress of students. It was concluded form the experimental study that, use of training aids is more beneficial than the old technique.

Key Words: Training Aids, Learning Progress

Additional Files

Published

2025-08-03

How to Cite

DIFFERENCE OF LEARNING PROGRESS IN STUDENTS BY USING CHALK-TALK STRATEGY AND TRAINING AIDS. (2025). Research Consortium Archive, 3(3), 525-534. https://rc-archive.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/214