ASSESSMENT OF DISASTER RESILIENCE IN PAKISTAN THROUGH THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK

Authors

  • Hina Habib M.Phil Graduate, Department of International Relations, Fatima Jinnah Women university, Rawalpindi Author
  • Dr. Samrana Afzal Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi Author
  • Dr. Sobia Hanif Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Fatim Author

Abstract

In the wake of frequent disasters and increased climate vulnerability, achieving resilience is now a matter of survival for Pakistan. Therefore, this study examines Pakistan’s disaster resilience under the Sendai Framework (2015–2030) by using neo-institutionalism theory. The research is based on a two-stage methodology. First, national policies and international reports were reviewed to understand Pakistan’s vulnerabilities and resilience efforts. Second, semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, government officials, and academia provided insights into the role of institutions in managing disaster risks. Based on the SFDRR and neo-institutionalism, a disaster resilience conceptual framework was used to evaluate Pakistan’s progress. The time frame used for assessment was post-2005 disaster management initiatives. It was found that weak institutional capacity, poor coordination, and governance issues hinder effective disaster risk reduction. Key challenges include inadequate early warning systems, reliance on external aid, and fragmented strategies. The study recommends integrated governance, community-based approaches, policy coherence, and investment in technology and risk financing to enhance disaster resilience in Pakistan

 

 

Key Words: Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Change Adaptation, Community-Based DM, Institutional Coherence, Disaster Resilience

Additional Files

Published

2025-08-08

How to Cite

ASSESSMENT OF DISASTER RESILIENCE IN PAKISTAN THROUGH THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK. (2025). Research Consortium Archive, 3(3), 683-705. https://rc-archive.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/230